Thanks, I've updated the docs to note to refer to the section below for guidance on a reasonable limit.
-- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast > -----Original Message----- > From: dmarc <dmarc-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely > Sent: Monday, October 2, 2023 11:44 AM > To: dmarc@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-13 > > On 02/10/2023 15:12, Brotman, Alex wrote: > > Please let me know if you have any additional issues or concerns. > > > One is the sentence " If validation is attempted for any DKIM signature, the > results > MUST be included in the report." toward the end of Section 2.1. It > contradicts > Section 2.1.2, which accounts for soft and hard limits of the number of > signatures > included in a report. > > > Best > Ale > -- > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc__;!!C > Ql3mcHX2A!BE33G7Czlzci_YKIJmchWsCSoKJ_oRMEx- > 0Eob11qTnOGdQBcxmtn5bL2vDL0cwgUQj75IE7NJ1BwEEVIyHr4aCn$ _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
