On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 4:00 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just picking over the ABNF with my checks, some Qs
>
> dmarc-version = "v" equals %s"DMARC1
>
>
> I believe the "%s" should be dropped
>

I think this was intentional; we want "v=DMARC1" to be valid and "v=dmarc1"
to be not valid.  Unless I'm remembering incorrectly ...


>   dmarc-value   = %x20-3A |  %x3C-7E
>
>
> I think it should be %x20-3A /  %x3C-7E
>

Yep.


>
> and now just something suggested.  The comments for URI read like this
>
>                 ; "URI" is imported from [RFC3986]; commas
>                 ; (ASCII 0x2C) and exclamation points
>                 ; (ASCII 0x21) MUST be encoded
>
> Could they be rewritten for readability
>
>                 ; "URI" is imported from [RFC3986];
>                 ; (ASCII 0x2C) commas and
>                 ; (ASCII 0x21) exclamation points
>                 ; MUST be encoded
>
> gladly tell me i'm too obsessive
>

A third suggestion:

                ; "URI" is imported from [RFC3986];
                ; commas (ASCII 0x2C) and exclamation
                ; points (ASCII 0x21) MUST be
                ; encoded

-MSK
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to