> On Feb 29, 2024, at 10:55 AM, Todd Herr
> <todd.herr=40valimail....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>
> Colleagues,
>
> I've been reading DMARCbic rev -30 today with a plan to collect the first set
> of minor edits and I came across a sentence that I believe goes beyond minor,
> so wanted to get a sanity check.
>
> Section 7.6, Domain Owner Actions, ends with the following sentence:
>
> In particular, this document makes explicit that domains for general-purpose
> email MUST NOT deploy a DMARC policy of p=reject.
>
> I don't believe this to be true, however. Rather, Section 8.6,
> Interoperability Considerations, says SHOULD NOT on the topic (e.g., "It is
> therefore critical that domains that host users who might post messages to
> mailing lists SHOULD NOT publish p=reject")
>
> Section 7.6 therefore should be updated to read "domains for general-purpose
> email SHOULD NOT deploy a DMARC policy of p=reject", yes?
>
Yes! Assuming general purpose is precisely, clearly defined we have a winner.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
