> On Apr 1, 2024, at 2:43 PM, John R. Levine <jo...@iecc.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2024, Jim Fenton wrote: >> Based on the above problems, I do not think DMARC-bis should be published as >> a standards track document by IETF. > > This reminds me of the NAT wars in the 1990s. We all understand that DMARC > has a lot of problems, but it's far more widely used than many of the IETF's > published standards. It just makes us look insular and out of touch to > pretend that it doesn't exist, or if we shut our eyes it will go away.
I’d be hugely dissapointed if this does not go into the standards track. N _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
