Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-dmarc-02-00: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dmarc/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Please find some comments below: # I guess this will be deleted from the version to be sent for external review: CURRENT: DMARC Charter [DRAFT] # Not sure which "consensus" we are talking about here. I think that we can simply delete this sentence: CURRENT: There now appears to be consensus to recharter in order to “un-abandon” the dangling document and complete the work. # An instance of a WG: what does that mean? CURRENT: This instance of the DMARC working group # Business as usual CURRENT: The responsible Area Director will have discretion regarding whether a full Last Call and IESG loop is needed to review those limited modifications. Not sure we need to have in this in the charter. "normal" process will be followed for these matters, IMO. # Should we include a formal milestone for this check? CURRENT: If it fails to meet this deadline or reaches consensus to cease work on the document, it will abandon that objective and instead begin the work of removing all references from the base document to the failure reporting document, and the latter will be permanently abandoned. Thank you. Cheers, Med _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
