Doug, you persist in trying to make DMARC more than it's designed to be. Please stop repeating this pattern. We're not changing the scope of DMARC here.
Again: Please stop this line of argument. Barry, as chair On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 3:01 PM Douglas Foster <[email protected]> wrote: > > Authentication problems can be put into these categories: > - Messages with malicious impersonation. > - Legitimate message with insufficient credentials at origination. > - Legitimate message whose credentials were lost in transit. > - Legitimate message from an entity sending on behalf of a domain member but > outside of domain owner control. > > If an evaluator determines that a message is legitimate, should he send a > failure report anyway? Or should the failure be considered a false positive > that can and should be ignored? > > At the moment, I favor encouraging report senders to suppress reporting on > messages that are judged to be legitimate. > > Doug Foster > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
