On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 11:15 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've also added two tentative subsection under IANA Considerations. > Although I > got no feedback on this, something needs to be done if that IANA page is > to > appear credible. > On the assumption that we do want to do this (more on that below), there's stuff missing like what registration policy you want that registry to have, what valid values are for "Status" and what those values mean, possible instructions for a designated expert, etc. See the process laid out in RFC 8126. But I'm wondering if this needs a registry. That list has not been updated since RFC 6591 was published. If it's rarely, if ever, extended, then is it enough to just say "This document updates 6591" and "Here's the new list" rather than making something almost-static for IANA to manage? -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
