On 9/28/25 3:38 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Sun 28/Sep/2025 07:34:52 +0200 Steven M Jones wrote:
Next up for a final review is section 7.
Wasn't Murray's replacement a review in itself.
I just reviewed Murray and Trent's replacement from August 23rd and the
responses. The results are already in the document, and I think they
work well.
So yes it's been reviewed, but it didn't hurt to make sure there were no
remaining issues.
7. Privacy Considerations The generation and transmission of DMARC
failure reports (sometimes referred to as "forensic reports") raise
significant privacy concerns that must be carefully considered
before deployment.
There are just a few of word changes and different RFCs cited in this
section under revision -16. Anybody wish to raise any concerns?
I was just summarizing the very small changes in this section between
-15 and -16, that's all. I think I meant to include a link to the diff,
but it doesn't matter. I think we can move on.
--S.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
