On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 03:44:19 +0200, Walter Bright <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/3/2011 5:56 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
I've stumbled over the fact that deduced function attributes (pure,
nothrow) are not reflected
in the name mangling. Is this a bug or by design?
It is by design. I think that's the right choice, but I'm not positive.
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
Well I see the point that it could be surprising for linkage.
I also understand that a function pointer to a function that is later
deduced to be pure nothrow gets a type of
pure nothrow. Tough to decide though.
I think as long as we stick with the current behavior we must prevent
TypeFunction from messing up the Type merging cache.
martin
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
