On Oct 10, 2014, at 06:09 AM, Walter Bright via dmd-internals
<[email protected]> wrote:
There's another problem, exhibited by:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4043
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3998
What both share is that a significant language change is coupled with the code
to implement it. The trouble is the PR then becomes a mixed-up review of the
code and the language design change. This makes it hard and confusing to
review, and
-- WORST OF ALL --
if the language design change is rejected, then the PR author's coding effort
has gone to waste. We don't have the luxury of throwing peoples' work away like
that. It pains me very much when this happens.
So please, please, before submitting a PR that involves a language change, be
sure you've got agreement and approval for the change. Otherwise, you risk
wasting your time in a most frustrating matter.
This is the only way to make things happen. Neither you or Andrei are caring
about the DIP's people create. They barley get any response at all from you or
Andrei when posted on the newsgroups. DIP's are were good ideas go to and die.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
