On 7/10/15 9:50 AM, Martin Nowak via dmd-internals wrote:
On 07/09/2015 09:01 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 9 jul 2015, at 15:14, Martin Nowak via dmd-internals
<[email protected]> wrote:
We cannot succeed by dumping code into the master branch.
It's important that we develop with the next release in mind.
If you’re concerned about code added to the master branch that should not be
part of the release, shouldn't there be a release branch then?
We have a release branch, it's called stable.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/tree/stable
Sigh, guess I'll have to repeat that for a while.
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP75
So whenever we start a new release, we branch master into stable. Why,
then, is it unadvisable to just continue business as usual in master?
Sorry for the silly question, just learning the ropes. -- Andrei
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
