On 8/13/2015 1:08 AM, Walter Bright via dmd-internals wrote:
On 8/12/2015 10:35 PM, Martin Nowak via dmd-internals wrote:
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 02:58:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Let's do that then.
Yep, 2.067 sounds good and it seems one of gdc/ldc will have a 2.067 before
2.069.
How about doing a PR for the sources? Seems to me we're just sitting around
jawboning, and not moving forward!
This discussion is necessary. Switching to ddmd is a big change with lots of
consequences and you should be willing to spent some time to make better
decisions.
This discussion is good. Delaying the PR to get the D sources in git is not so
good. I don't see any reason for further delay.
I.e. the decision on how to compile ddmd for release only has to be made at
release time, not before we switch to ddmd. The ongoing gdc/ldc improvements can
be done concurrently with getting ddmd in shape to release, because while ddmd
is being developed it can be compiled with an existing dmd.
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
