Dear all, I support [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01, which provides clear current practices of IP mobility protocols and gap analysis.
Cheers. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Jouni Korhonen <jouni...@gmail.com> wrote: > Folks, > > We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies for > that. The next step is to select a "current practices and gap analysis" > document to serve as the basis for the future WG document. We consider two > documents on this topic to choose from: > > [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 > [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 > > and we as a WG need to decide which one is going to form the _basis_ for > the WG document. > > Please voice your preference either for [1] or for [2] on the mailing > list. We would appreciate if you can also provide a one-liner justification > for your selection. The chairs will determine if there is (rough) consensus > from active WG participants to proceed with selecting one document against > the other. > > The call starts today 19th Dec 2012 and ends by 10th Jan 2013. We have a > longer three week call now due the holiday season in between. > > - Jouni & Julien > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > -- RSM Department, TELECOM Bretagne, France Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random #email: jonghyouk (at) gmail (dot) com #webpage: http://sites.google.com/site/hurryon/
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
