I think our extensions should be to the prefix information option and not DHCP.

The properties of an address may change after a handover and we should not 
couple
the DHCP state machine (which is about lease renewal) to the handover state 
machine.

-Pete


pierrick.se...@orange.com wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com] Envoyé : jeudi 20
>> mars 2014 10:00 À : SEITE Pierrick IMT/OLN Cc : Alper Yegin;
>> dmm@ietf.org Objet : Re: [DMM] re-charter text updated
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 4:44 PM, pierrick.se...@orange.com wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>> De : dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Alper Yegin
>>>> Envoyé : jeudi 20 mars 2014 09:42 À : Jouni Korhonen Cc :
>>>> dmm@ietf.org Objet : Re: [DMM] re-charter text updated
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Alper Yegin <alper.ye...@yegin.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Jouni,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 6:03 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> o Mobility state exposing I-D. This would communication between
>>>>>>>>> the end host and the network. Maybe also covering the missing
>>>>>>>>> parts within the end host.. Are we OK with one I-D or how people
>>>>>>>>> want to see this? o ..
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> There's the API aspect on the terminal (one I-D), and there is
>>>>>>>> the MN-network interface ones (e.g., extending RA, DHCP, etc.)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So you want an API document? I have some reservations
> documenting
>> an
>>>>>>> APIs as-is. Could this be an extension to RFC5014? I'd see this
>>>>>>> approach feasible since there are even (partial)
>>>>>>> implementations of the RFC5014 in popular operating systems.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yes, we are talking about extensions to source address selection
>>>>>> (RFC
>>>> 5014).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ack.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Then the subsequent thing. Each MN-NW interface would be one
>>>>>>> document, if I understand the above comment correctly? Which
>>>>>>> one(s)
>> to
>>>> do first?
>>>>>>> ND or/and DHCP?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yes. Both.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ack. Since we are coming up with I-D numbers, any preference on the
>>>>> protocols that we patch..?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> between ND and DHCP? DHCP..
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'd say ND first :-)...  but, anyway, do we really need two
> different
>> documents? Although, container differs, I guess extensions will be the
>> same.
>> 
>> Second the ND thing ;)
>> 
>> Why two docs.. DHCP is usually easy going as you can practically
>> shove a flock of pigeons into it and people are just fine. ND is
>> always a different story ;)
> 
> Ok, I got it...
> 
>> 
>> - JOuni
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> Alper
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> - Jouni
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Alper
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - JOuni
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Alper
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> - Jouni
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Jouni Korhonen
>>>>>>>>> <jouni.nos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I have updated the charter draft text slightly:
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-
>>>>>>>>>> charter/blob/master/recharter_ draft.txt
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Basically:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Added Sri's comment on PMIPv6 maintenance. Added Alper's
>>>>>>>>>> comment of location of mobility functions. Added links to other
>>>>>>>>>> IETF WGs on possible mobility enabling technologies. Added a
>>>>>>>>>> comment that virtualised network functions are in scope.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> - Jouni
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> dmm mailing list
>>>>>>>>> dmm@ietf.org
>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dmm mailing list
>>>> dmm@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>> 
>>> 
>> ___________________________________________________________
>> ___________________________________________________________
>> ___
>>> 
>>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
>>> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses,
>>> exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message
>>> par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi
>>> que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles
>>> d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete
>>> altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>>> 
>>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
>>> privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not
>>> be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have
>>> received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this
>>> message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not
>>> liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>>> Thank you.
>>> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________ _
> __________________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses,
> exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message
> par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi
> que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles
> d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete
> altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
> privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not
> be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
> been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm



_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to