On 3/26/18, 5:16 PM, "Tom Herbert" <t...@quantonium.net> wrote:
>> With regards to SR encapsulation: "this is using IP-in-IP as default. >> Why not using UDP encapsulation?" > I am really hoping we will be able to apply SRH insertion without the need for IP encapsulation. At least for mobile environments within a closed administrative domains, there should be exceptions for allowing insertion of SRH by a on-path node. I realize there are issues with ICMP error messages hitting the source etc, but we should be able to document those issues and specify work arounds. I understand there have been discussions on this topic before, but I hope authors will find some agreements for the same. Sri <with no chair hat> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
