Thanks Minh-Ngoc,

Leveraging a DSD(Direct Segment Discovery) advertisement to find computing resources identified with CATS IDs sounds interesting. 

Let me see more detail considerations described in your draft. My first point for that would be:

- NLRI in a DSD route corresponds which ID, CS-ID, or CIS-ID, while MUP ext-comm identifies,
- Direct segment ID in a MUP ext-comm identifies which ID, CS-ID, or CIS-ID.

IMO so far was that DSD route NLRI for CIS-ID, MUP ext-comm for CS-ID. Let me think more on that, and get back to you.

Cheers,
--satoru

On Jul 31, 2024, at 2:05, Minh Ngoc Tran <[email protected]> wrote:


Dear DMM members,

We updated our cats-mup draft based on discussion and comments from the IETF 120 meeting.
Any comments are welcomed and appreciated. 

Best regards,
Minh-Ngoc

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 1:58 AM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-dcn-dmm-cats-mup-02.txt
To: Minh-Ngoc Tran <[email protected]>, Younghan Kim <[email protected]>


A new version of Internet-Draft draft-dcn-dmm-cats-mup-02.txt has been
successfully submitted by Minh-Ngoc Tran and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:     draft-dcn-dmm-cats-mup
Revision: 02
Title:    Computing Aware Traffic Steering Consideration for Mobile User Plane Architecture
Date:     2024-07-30
Group:    Individual Submission
Pages:    13
URL:      https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dcn-dmm-cats-mup-02.txt
Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dcn-dmm-cats-mup/
HTML:     https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dcn-dmm-cats-mup-02.html
HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dcn-dmm-cats-mup
Diff:     https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-dcn-dmm-cats-mup-02

Abstract:

   The document [I-D.draft-mhkk-dmm-srv6mup-architecture] describes the
   Mobile User Plane (MUP) architecture for Distributed Mobility
   Management.  The proposed architecture converts the user mobility
   session information from the control plane entity to an IPv6
   dataplane routing information.  When there are multiple candidate
   instances located at different location to serve an user request, the
   MUP Provider Edge (PE) might prioritize the closest service location.
   However, the closest routing path might not be the optimal route.

   This document discusses how the mentioned MUP architecture can be
   leveraged to set up dataplane routing paths to the optimal service
   instance location with the assistance of computing-aware traffic
   steering capabilities.  For each session request, based on the up-to-
   date collected computing and network information, the MUP controller
   can convert the session information to the optimal route.



The IETF Secretariat




--

__________________________________

Minh-Ngoc Tran

IISTRC - Internet Infra System Technology Research Center

369, Sangdo-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 06978
Tel : +82-2-820-0841

Email: [email protected]

__________________________________

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to