Hi Linda, thank you for your review. It is highly appreciated.
> This node could implement SRv6 endpoint behaviors for GTP decapsulation > (e.g., End.M.GTP6.E for IPv6 transport), allowing seamless integration with > existing RAN deployments. Just a clarification, "End.M.GTP6.E" is actually a GTP-U encap behavior. But yes seamless integration with existing deployment need to be explained. Let me think. Cheers, --satoru > 2025/03/27 19:39、Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>のメール: > > DMM participants, > > As promised during the DMM session at IETF 122, I have reviewed > draft-mhkk-dmm-mup-architecture-02. I found the document is very clearly > written and easy to follow. > > Given the widespread deployment of 3GPP 4G/5G architectures, I think it would > be valuable to include a section on interworking strategies that enable MUP > to overlay existing infrastructure. This would allow the MUP routing-based > user plane to be introduced incrementally, without disrupting current network > operations. > > For instance, a MUP-PE could be deployed at the RAN backhaul edge—adjacent to > a gNodeB or eNodeB—to terminate incoming GTP-U tunnels from the RAN. This > node could implement SRv6 endpoint behaviors for GTP decapsulation (e.g., > End.M.GTP6.E for IPv6 transport), allowing seamless integration with existing > RAN deployments. > > Best regards, > > Linda Dunbar > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
