Hi Bill,

One of the values for SRv6, compared to GTP, is it's stateless. But, the
goal for Marcus is open a study at 3GPP to come up with a comparable
analysis for U-GTP and SRv6.

On your point for RAN-related information, I'll invite you to read the
document TR. 29.892 section 6.2
*6.2.2*: Details how SRv6 can be applied within 5GC, including protocol
adaptation to the N3/N9/N6 interfaces and mapping from GTP attributes
(e.g., QFI, TEID) to SIDs.

Thanks,
Dan

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 12:03 PM Bill Gage <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Markus -
>
> I'm a bit confused by your proposal.
>
> As indicated in the slide set, slides 1-7, SRv6 makes sense as a TE
> replacement for MPLS in the user plane. But I don't see how SRv6 (at
> least in its current form) provides value as a replacement for GTP-U.
>
> In addition to the PDU (IP packet) being transported, GTP-U includes a
> header that contains RAN-related information fields such as end point
> identifier (for mapping to a radio bearer), sequence numbers, QoS
> information, etc.
>
> What value is SRv6 bringing to this capability?
>
> /bill
>
> On 2025-07-21 12:33 p.m., [email protected] wrote:
> > Dear DMM and SRv6ops community,
> >
> > I would like to draw your attention to an activity that we want to bring
> > to 3GPP to investigate for 6G. It is about the replacement of GTP-U by
> > SRv6 for mobile user plane. This should be of particular interest to all
> > operators/vendors already using/implementing SRv6 or planning its
> > introduction.
> >
> > The last three slides in the slide set at https://datatracker.ietf.org/
> > meeting/123/materials/slides-123-srv6ops-21-advancing-deutsche-telekoms-
> > traffic-engineering-for-srv6-01 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/
> > meeting/123/materials/slides-123-srv6ops-21-advancing-deutsche-telekoms-
> > traffic-engineering-for-srv6-01> provide more information about our
> > motivation and will be presented by me tomorrow during srv6ops session.
> >
> > Please read them, attend tomorrow's SRv6ops session or contact me or
> > Maria if you are interested.
> >
> > We are particularly interested in expanding our round of supporters in
> > 3GPP, getting an assessment from you that you may have already done on
> > this topic and studying with you if 3GPP agrees.
> >
> > Br
> >
> > Markus
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to