Hi Kapil,
I have tested the changes in the SVN, and they seem to be
working for the small test case. However, in my real test case,
I was running into issues for the same problem. I attempted to narrow down the
issue, and created an albeit larger test case,
but one that still is relatively small. It seems that the problem occurs when I
am also using AF_UNIX sockets. Actually, I think
the new version in the SVN has problems with AF_UNIX sockets in general, but
perhaps it's something special in my test case.
I'm going to send you the test case directly, it's too large for me to paste
entirely into the forum, but I'll describe it here.
Basically my program sets up two sockets, one using AF_INET with port 0, to
pick a free one. It also creates a AF_UNIX
socket, which either creates a temporary file for a pipe or can be set using an
environment variable IPC_FNAME.
When I use a temporary file, I get a series of 3 warnings, and I get two
messages about "Bind failed", which I assume is
for each socket. When I specify a file with IPC_FNAME, I only get 1 warning,
and a single message about "Bind failed".
In this case, the socket number changes.
Josh
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How fast is your code?
3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production.
Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Dmtcp-forum mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dmtcp-forum
