On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 17:23 -0600, T.J. Duchene wrote: > What can it do in the right? Nothing that can't be done without the TPM > chip. One of the first things that you learn in computer engineering is > that anything problem can be solved on software or hardware. The only > difference is a question of efficiency.
Keep to the fundamentals. TPM is all about trust. So long as I'm using it to enhance my trust that the machines under my control are actually under my control I deem it a good thing. If it is to be used to let somebody ELSE trust my machines in ways I can't control I'm probably not going to put up with it and disable the chip. Just that simple, just look at who is trusting who and the question of whether it is good clears up instantly. And yes, putting the thing in hardware does enhance security in ways software alone simply can't.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
