Доброго времени суток, Didier.
Спасибо за ответ, Tue, 03 Feb 2015 12:31:33 +0100, вы писали: > I think it is fine that T.J.Duchene gives his opinion, although > I disagree with him. I'm very optimistic about Systemd-free Linux, so > optimistic that I think Devuan is simply preparing the future of > Debian. Sure! > The reason why RedHat develops and enforces systemd is clear to > me: they have customers paying for a ready-made system that RedHat > would maintain. They want to increase their productivity by > introducing tools which automate things as much as possible, plus > security-related features -- a valid sales argument. It makes full > sense; that's their busyness model. Which security you are talking about? systems - has a lot of poorely tested code at one hand, that uses root-priveleges at another hand! > But what are Debian maintainers/developpers working for? OK they > try to provide an OS that's usable out of the box, but for who? Sure For those who has power over the developers|maintainers, that like security issues of software, who need to control every person on the planet, or occupy the planet! - And who is it?! - As usually, the well-known planet accupants, the original capitalists, the US/UK ! > it works for Everybody, they claim, but this includes primarily > people like themselves, geeks and hackers. And they likely will see > geeks and hackers run away. Debian has taken a very wrong decision but > they're going to have chances to change it. No! They continue as it is the goal of the 4 voters and their masters: to bind the great project to themselves. In systemd i see pure attack on linux and the free software. С уважением, Ста. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
