On 28/05/2015 11:43, Didier Kryn wrote:
porting to Musl was not finished yet - still problems with dynamic linking he says. I prefer Musl to uClibc for several reasons
I'm using musl too. You can use the Aboriginal toolchains, even if they're uClibc-based, to compile musl, and then link stuff against musl. It just requires tweaking the musl-gcc.specs file a bit. More details offline if you want!
finally bootstrapped my toolchain from https://github.com/sabotage-linux/sabotage . But, even in Sabotage, the compiler is not sysrooted :-(
Yeah, I tried Sabotage too, and it's good, but I prefer the Aboriginal toolchains, for this reason and other ones (for instance, a fully static toolchain is much more elegant and easy to move around). -- Laurent _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
