> -----Original Message----- > From: T.J. Duchene [mailto:t.j.duch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 12:14 PM > To: 'Teodoro Santoni' > Subject: RE: [DNG] systemd in wheezy, was: Re: bummer > > > > > > > > > And as a caveman, I would also very much appreciate a sensible > > > > > quoting, even if it seems that this little thing has become too > > > > > harsh to ask and too hard to obtain in the last few years... > > > > > > > > Believe me, the text/plain version is worse, having no quoting at all. > > > > But it took me only three rereads to understand who said what, so > > whatever... > > > > > > > > > > Believe me, if people knew how to quote properly, then you could > > > immediately understand who said what in reply to what else written > > > by whoever else. As always, evil is not in the medium, but rather in > > > how one (mis-)uses it... > > Sorry about that, boys. =) > > Hopefully, you can read this better. To me, it makes no difference as I can > read either equally well. Personally, I could care less. I just usually use > whatever the default is. I work with a variety of systems all the time. I > don't > let it bother me. Every bit of software has its quirks these days. Business > likes HTML mail because of formatting. > > James P.: "I also do not think recreating SVCHOST is wise. I followed Windows > since 2000 and since then SVCHOST has pulled in more and more growing the > system requirements exponentially from 266mhz and 32mb RAM to 1 GHz > and 1 GB RAM. This should NOT be done in GNU/Linux." > > Me: "That is really a massive oversimplification. You really have to remember > that you are demanding the computer perform an average of 50+ processes > at any given time. You can’t blame SVCHOST for that. The credit for that > goes to people demanding more. If you want less resource use, people > should start monotasking." > > Granted, 50 is usually an underrated example. Most "modern" operating > systems have at least 50 processes running at a given time. I've been around > long enough that I've seen personal computers go from very simple process > models to what we have today, and while there is something to be said for > how the efficiency of individual processes are handled, virtually every OS > has > had an ever increasing gluttony for more processing power, not less. > > I assumed you all would actually have more to say about my comments > regarding Linux "retreading the same ground" as Microsoft, but surprises are > usually always good. > > Have a fabulous day, gentlemen. =) > > T.J.
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
