On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:37:26AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 08:16:06PM -0700, James Powell wrote: > > I never said it was set in stone. > > > > All I suggested was if you install a package like SDL, then you install all > > of SDL, not just part of it. This reduces overhead of making multiple > > packages, simplifies the distribution, and makes the work of the package > > maintainer easier. > > > > Again, I don't see why I should have ALL the stuff that comes with > sdl, including tons of header files, bindings for python, perl, ocaml, > libs with debugging symbols and so forth if my application just needs > libsdl1.2....
Agree. Should there be an easy way to find all those other things if one only knows one is using libsdl1.2....? -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
