One argument I hear often about systemd is that it more adapted to current hardware needs, [e.g. here][1]
> Computers changed so much that they often doesn’t even look like > computers. And their operating systems are very busy : GPS, wireless > networks, USB peripherals that come and go, tons of softwares and > services running at the same time, going to sleep / waking up in a > snap… Asking the antiquated SysVinit to manage all this is like asking > your grandmother to twerk. What I don't understand is how an init system manages hot pluggable devices. What does replacing a hot plugable disk drive it have to do with how the system is booted? Maybe this all done at the none init parts of systemd? ### I know this is a hot topic for some people. It is not meant to ignite a war, rather to understand. Please explain it to me with out flames. [1]: http://sysadmin.tme520.net/systemd-our-songs-of-innocence/ Greetings, Oz --- Imagine there's no countries it isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion too Imagine all the people Living life in peace
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng