Laurent Bercot <ska-de...@skarnet.org> writes: > On 24/09/2015 17:51, Rainer Weikusat wrote: >> If it starts working within less than five minutes, users will forget >> about it faster than they could complain, especially for a system which >> is usually supposed to be running. But that's actually a digression. > > Five minutes? And you think it's acceptable?
As a matter of fact, I know this is more than acceptable and less than actually needed. [...] >> Provided a program is supposed to work this out on its own, this >> information can be modelled as 'a dependency'. But you could equally >> well modify rc.local to do a >> >> mount-all-filesystem >> >> before a >> >> start-the-services > > You mean, removing the mounts from your service manager? Sure, you > can always do everything by hand. That's a false dichotomoy and I 'meant' that simple ordering requirements of this kind don't have to be worked out by complicated programs at run time. NB: I've (also purposely) ignored both the flamebaits and the wrong assumptions about my situation and "situations" in general. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
