Timo Buhrmester <fstd.l...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 06:05:00PM +0000, Rainer Weikusat wrote: >> Timo Buhrmester <fstd.l...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> > Fatal error: can't create obj/backend.o: No such file or directory >> >> >> >> create a dummy file in this directory and check that into the SCM. >> >> >> > Why should the repository have to remember a build system detail? >> >> >> >> >> >> Because the build system is part of the code. >> >> > It would still be preferable if the build system was stand-alone, rather >> >> > than depending on a repository twist. >> >> >> >> It would be "preferable" if a SCM would just store whatever one desires >> >> to put into it. >> > Do you have any point or do you just enjoy typing? >> >> One could argue that I was somewhat careless in my first reply to you as >> I actually wrote something about you (namely, "that's your opinion but >> not mine") which sort-of solicitated an angry retort. > ??? > >> However, stating that "a source code management system" or - better term >> here - "version control system" should simply store whatever someone >> desires to store in, just like - say - a filesystem, is certainly not >> a personal remark. > Correct, that is not a personal remark. Why are you pointing this out? > > > Just to get back on topic since you obviously lost track of the > discussion:
In order to highlight your flaming. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng