On Mon, 16 May 2016, emnin...@riseup.net wrote: > As for the rest, i'd be interested in what you think about the > content of that discussion.
I think it minimizes the problem systemd brings to Debian and the problem the current Debian leadership has with its own constituency. I sincerely wish the remedy of installing openrc and pinning systemd would work, but I'm sure it won't on the mid-long term. To all those who think this and other similar approaches may invalidate the need of our fork: please consider we are not just forking Debian because of systemd, but because the people who have taken over the leadership of that distro have betrayed its mandate, shown no respect of its Constitution and offer no reliability anymore for any reasonable professional use of Debian. I'm talking about the hooligans and politicians who are using systemd as an occasion to take over and bully away disagreement, those who Bruce Perens defines the "anal-retentive policy wonks who believe they only make the distribution for themselves and have (perhaps without intending to) systematically marginalized Debian and made the project a whore to Ubuntu." https://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5852295&cid=48188823 ciao _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng