+1 As a jwm user I would really like to see it brought up to date.
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Irrwahn <irrw...@freenet.de> wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2016 17:48:33 +0200, Irrwahn Grausewitz wrote: > <snip> > > Looking at the source package I cannot see a single > > invasive patch WRT to the original source. > <snip> > > Correction: I missed a patch when skimming over the > package contents. I can see now what you meant by > "Debianisms". Sorry for the confusion! > > A Devuan fork of jwm would make sense then, and it'd > be a trivial one at that. > > Regards > Urban > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
