Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:32:14 +0300
From: Lars Noodén<lars.noo...@gmail.com>
To:dng@lists.dyne.org

On 06/06/2016 02:16 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:08:27PM +0300, Lars Noodén wrote:
>>I've been messing around with building a live image and notice that it
>>looks like there are a lot of different mirrors getting called into
>>play.  I was expecting the same mirrors to be used each time so I could
>>populate my local cache on the first try and then use that cache on
>>subsequent builds.  Is there any efficient way to cache everything I
>>access on the first try?  I'm using squid3 right now but should I be
>>using apt-cacher or apt-cacher-ng instead?
>
>apt-cacher-ng works a great deal better than squid.  It knows about the same
>file on different mirrors being supposed to be the same, checksums, rdiff
>apt indices, expires files not based on time but on them disappearing from
>indices, etc.
Thanks.  I notice apt-cacher-ng has some weird dependencies.  I don't
mind so much that it requires ed, though I think that is unnecessary.  I
do mind that it wants libsystemd0.  What is the right way to report that
bug in the package dependency?

Regards,
Lars
You can use apt-mirror to easily mirror the repositories of you choice.
Long time ago that I used it but here is a extensive howto https://www.howtoforge.com/local_debian_ubuntu_mirror


Grtz

Nick
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to