On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 07:48:11PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote: > > I would say that nowadays things like: > > - Mounting filesystems > - Configuring networking > - Configuring consoles > - Launching daemons for different services > - Offering logins > > are all part fo what I consider "system initialisation". Obviously, if > you have exactly one filesystem, no networking, exactly one console, > no daemon to run, and you don't mind using the system as "root", then > initialisation can be reduces to 12 lines of code which run a > shell. But then why on earth do yo need a multiuser-multiprogrammed > operating system? you'd be better off using DOS...
You'd still be better off than DOS, having a usable shell and a better file system. Do you forget how bad DOS was? -- hendrik > > HND > > KatolaZ > > -- > [ ~.,_ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab ] > [ "+. katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it ] > [ @) http://kalos.mine.nu --- Devuan GNU + Linux User ] > [ @@) http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia -- GPG: 0B5F062F ] > [ (@@@) Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ ] > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng