On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:23:08PM +0200, Irrwahn wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:37:32 +0100, Katolaz wrote: > [...] > > no array can be actually "passed" to function, > [...] > > I'm not trying to argue against anything you wrote in your > spot-on analysis, but regarding that one claim quoted above > one could postulate that an exception to that rule exists > for arrays[1] that are members of structure types, i.e. > structs or unions. > > Wrapping an array as the sole member in a struct can be > abused to "emulate" passing an array to a function. It is > to be frowned upon though, as it rarely is justifiable. >
You are definitely right mate :) That's insane, and weird, and convoluted, but is possible, and correct :D HND KatolaZ -- [ ~.,_ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ "+. katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it ] [ @) http://kalos.mine.nu --- Devuan GNU + Linux User ] [ @@) http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia -- GPG: 0B5F062F ] [ (@@@) Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ ] _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
