On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 11:29:09AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 06:18:28AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > I'd say GTK3 doesn't "have regressions", but "it's one big regression". > > Just to name a few: CSD, font selection dialog, file open/save dialog, etc. > > > > However, I see most project which didn't abandon the GTK ship altogether > > (Chromium, LXDE, etc) downgrading to GTK3 these days: Firefox (was in > > Typo? Or is there a GTK4 they are downgrading from? Or have I > completely misunderstood? (I'm not being sarcastic; misunderstanding > happens often enough.)
My apologies, this was indeed confusing. I meant that GTK2->GTK3, despite increasing the version number, is a functionality downgrade. It's worse in all areas of usability I've noticed, it breaks programs that use it almost every minor version, completely fails in some of my use cases (like X forwarding), imposes Gnome3 conventions on unrelated software, etc. -- An imaginary friend squared is a real enemy. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
