Quoting Simon Hobson (li...@thehobsons.co.uk): > You didn't read what I wrote did you ?
I most certainly did. And I make no apologies for mildly mocking you for speaking about a 'trojan', as that was patently ridiculous, and you know it. > It may be "inert" now - well actually it isn't completely inert if > it's being called by packages with gratuitous dependencies on it* - 'Doing' something that is functionally indistinguishable from doing nothing. And a '000' rights mask would be fully effective paranoia insurance. > but as I said, there is zero guarantee that it won't remain "inert" > forever. Are you capable of preventing the installation of package systemd? I am. Thus, libsystemd0 does, in end-result, nothing. But this is basically you doing a 'I don't like it' performance piece. And: > I only ask that you respect my viewpoint. I'll do that if you cease shading the truth. It's tiresome. And it's possible less-wary readers might be mislead, which would make me sad. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
