On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:17:40 -0700, Rick wrote in message <20160727201740.gf10...@linuxmafia.com>:
> Quoting Simon Hobson (li...@thehobsons.co.uk): > > > And won't you then find that all those packages with gratuitous > > libsystemd0 dependencies will stop working ? > > I have a better question: Is there something about empiricism that > many people on this mailing list cannot cope with? > > Back when I had newly joined this mailing list and all of these idle > allegations and rhetorical questions started being posted, I decided > to do that thing.... What's it called? Oh, right: 'Checking.' > > I did a quick smoke test on my test VM by chmod'ing > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsystemd.so.0.3.1 to 000, starting Apache, > making sure it appeared to work OK, and skimming its logs looking for > anything amiss. Nothing wrong that I was able to see. > > If I ever get to worrying about this in production after attending to > all the myriad _real_ concerns I have, I suppose I'd more-carefully > check various things that might have screwy problem and might not. > Meanwhile, I also would expect none, simply on grounds of the known > facts of what's in the damned thing. > > Now, you guys presumably all have Linux systems. Why pose the > question? Why not just check, if you want to know? ..re-running your tests now, do you still get the same results now, as back then when you first checked? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
