Quoting Adam Borowski (kilob...@angband.pl):

> Cool, so running ntp twice, once for the big jump, then for long-term
> stabilization, is not needed.

Yr. welcome!

> So it's better than ntpdate: on discrepanties on the order of a few
> seconds, ntpdate used slew instead of step to "gently" change the
> time; this is a bad idea if you're about to run ntpd or something that
> needs good time immediately after calling ntpdate.

The ISC NTP suite is very flexible.  Most problems I see people having
are things like 'sync failed because of too big a jump', which means
someone was using its (conservative) defaults and neither looking in the
logfiles nor in the manpage.

(I'd still suggest also taking a look at OpenNTPd.  I don't yet
know enough about OpenNTPd's details to answer detailed questions,
whereas ISC NTPd is extremely familiar, from work.  The latter is kind
of like ISC's BIND9; not something I'm enthusiastic about, but I have a
lot of history with it.)

> SNTP _is_ adequate for single-fire adjustments.  It's a compatible subset of
> proper NTP.

I do not concur, e.g., SNTP cannot handle a set of upstream time hosts,
only a single one.  This is IMO a bit pathetic, and the wiser course of
action is to ignore it and use real NTP software.

> So it does what MS-Windows do, ie, cron-jobbed single-fire
> adjustments?  

I'm not well briefed on all of the particulars of what any specific
implementation of SNTP does.  I took a ten-minute look at some of the
basic protocol's design omissions, said to myself 'Someone has to be
joking', and went back to real NTP.

> > ISC's NTP Project reference implementation's developers are, with
> > what I hope is reluctance and a sense of resignation, in the middle
> > of developing a 'sntpd' piece, but I wouldn't touch it on a dare.
> 
> Why would they do so?

Even though ISC are only a short bicycle ride from me, I am unable to
read their minds.  ;->

-- 
Cheers,                         "On the Internet, no one knows you're a dog --
Rick Moen                       unless you type 'woof, woof, woof'."
r...@linuxmafia.com                                               -- pyellman
McQ! (4x80)
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to