Quoting Arnt Gulbrandsen (a...@gulbrandsen.priv.no): > Rick Moen writes: > >One recursive namserver per LAN is obviously better than several on > >grounds of multiple considerations that I won't belabour here. > > Is it, really? Significantly?
Really but absolutely _not_ significantly. As I also said in the referenced post, IMO all those 'load on root/tld nameserver' arguments are ludicrously overblown as commonly advanced in (other instances of) these discussions. Methinks the people so arguing are basically bikeshedding (http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/lexicon.html#bikeshed) and don't really understand the effect of caching and huge TTL values. You might not have noticed that you were strenuously agreeing with me. ;-> _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
