On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 08:18:10PM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote: > Hi Hendrick, > > 1] As has happened in the past, I'm not sure I understand what you > wrote. > > 2] Your comment about the issue being about a ''devuan package' did > send me into a panic, so I double-checked, and it seems that the > package is the unmodified debian 'dnscrypt-proxy_1.9.4-1_amd64.deb' > downloaded from a debian repository, as forwarded by the devuan > server. Just in case I have this wrong somehow, because it is > important, what led you to think it was a package modified by devuan, > and how did you check?
Because of the lines > -- System Information: > Distributor ID: Devuan > Description: Devuan GNU/Linux 1.0 (jessie) in the Debian bug report. Of course this didn't prove it was a Devuan package, but it may be one of the things that made a Debainista dismiss it. They'd be interested if a Debian package failed to work on Debian system, but not if it failed on a Devuan system, as they might suspect. -- hendrik . _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
