On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:29:12 +0100 Simon Hobson <li...@thehobsons.co.uk> wrote:
> k...@aspodata.se wrote: > But then I'm one of those generally happy with SysVInit style > booting. It's easy to understand, it's generally reliable, it's > fairly easy to debug if something isn't right. But I also recognise > that others aren't happy and if they want to use something else then > that's OK by me - as long as what they propose isn't something that > "infects" stuff I want to run under SysVInit. Hi Simon, This is the perfect opportunity to explore this more. Karl is one of the tiny minority of people to have successfully booted using the Busybox Init. Hi Karl, How did you like the Busybox Init? Do you still use Busybox Init, or do you use a different init system for your day to day computing? I think you once made documentation for how you installed Busybox Init. If so, could you please post the URL to your documentation? SteveT Steve Litt April 2017 featured book: Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/techniques _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng