On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:47:53AM +0200, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > Oh, no, not the "Open Source Initiative"! Richard Matthew Stallman > stills very often goes out of the way to explain that Open Source is not > really free!
Even the GDFL (Gnu free documentation license) has restrictions on copying, with their "invariant sections". This is why a lot of GNU documentation is distributed as nonfree by Debian. Although not designed for the purpose, I would advise licencing documentation and media under the same licence as the code (in *addition* to any other possibly more approriate licence like CC or GFDL) in case some future modifier of the code would find it convenient to include it as part of the executable. I wrote a free game (http://topoi.pooq.com/hendrik/dv/free/fun/wander/index.html) once as part of the liberated pixel cup challenge (http://lpc.opengameart.org/), and I can't put the images into the executable as initialized data because of their licenses. -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
