On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Massimiliano Baldinelli wrote: > On 2017-06-13 11:39, KatolaZ wrote: > > >It would be great if somebody (better if "many-body" :P) could confirm > >whether an upgrade from the current ascii version to those packages is > >flawless or not. > > Ciao KatolaZ :) > > Since I use testing I'm just installing it to give it a try. What system > info should I include in my next reply (eg. kernel version, current desktop, > and the like) >
Hi Max, kernel version could be irrelevant, but which desktop manager you are using should not be so. Thanks KatolaZ -- [ ~.,_ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ "+. katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it ] [ @) http://kalos.mine.nu --- Devuan GNU + Linux User ] [ @@) http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia -- GPG: 0B5F062F ] [ (@@@) Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
