On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:10:34 +0200, Alessandro wrote in message <20170705121034.0040505a@pulvis.localnet>:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 at 10:56:45 +0100 > KatolaZ <kato...@freaknet.org> wrote: > > [...] > > > Please, please, please: let's avoid to tranform this in a flame. The > > thing is that Devuan/main should include only free-software, and > > that clause makes the package non-compliant with the basic freedom > > 0. We would like suggestions as of whether the clause should be > > removed or the package should go in Devuan/non-free (I can't see > > any other5B alternative). > > The best thing that could happen is, of course, that the software > authors changed the licence terms or at least that we received > special permission to redistribute the software in Devuan under > different terms. Let's try, hopefully they are reasonable people and > will prefer having their software more widely circulated and used. ..this can be done (3) 2 ways, toss it into non-free (for now), and get a compatible dual license for Devuan and other non-systemd distros. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng