T On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 10:46:31 -1000 Joel Roth <jo...@pobox.com> wrote:
> > Edward Bartolo wrote: > > Using this 'resource' will do a disservice to Devuan. Anyone serious > > enough to read it will get the wrong impression that Devuan is some > > 'amateur' distribution not worthy of wasting professional hours on > > it. Scientific and technical text must at all costs avoid > > opinionated writing but this resource does the opposite. As said > > earlier, there is no objective comparism between the different > > inits. > Edward, > > I think that any articles that interest people in > exploring this part of their Linux systems can only > be good. True, but before promoting this bare outline resource, people should be referred to resources such as my Manjaro Experiments, Rich Felker's ewontfix.com/14 and ewontfix.com/15, http://thedjbway.b0llix.net/daemontools.html, http://troubleshooters.com/linux/diy/suckless_init_on_plop.htm, and if I had time probably 30 other excellent articles that give a clearer definition of what most people mean by a "supervisor", and more generally accurate priorities in init system composition. SteveT _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
