I like to think of systemd as the lazy man's solution to init. I am not really a developer persay, but you guys seem to convey what I just said and what I am about to say,
systemd slogan, "*IF it isn't broken*... *Break IT!*" Also another slogan for systemd: "*The**Donald Trump**of **Init*!" and last but not least, "*The lazy Developer's way out!*" but seriously, is laziness really the only reason so many distros switched to systemd? If so... that is frankly in the words of the orange unstable man of hot air: "*SAD*!" *):* On 11/01/2017 08:57 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:24:34PM -0400, taii...@gmx.com wrote: >> There is always one reason or another for "a start job is running for - >> network interfaces/disks/etc)" which halts the entire boot process >> "faster", even without those it still is much slower than devuan. > Wow! Systemd even halts faster! > > -- hendrik > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng