On Friday 12 January 2018 at 18:23:19, Steve Litt wrote: > Just speaking for myself, because of its deliberate obfuscations making > integration extremely difficult, I don't consider SystemD to be free > software.
So what do you classify it as? Proprietary? Closed source? Commercial? What label works best for you? > [1]: This point is credible only if one believes the primary motivation > for maintaining systemd is the obfuscation of Linux to make money > with Linux training and consultation. I have that belief. Interesting. I don't agree, but it's an interesting theory. Antony. -- "The future is already here. It's just not evenly distributed yet." - William Gibson Please reply to the list; please *don't* CC me. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng