Forwarding to the ML because I messed up the recipient. On February 15, 2018 4:21:03 AM GMT+03:00, Fungal-net <fungal...@protonmail.com> wrote: >If you are officially representing Devuan and "a long email" described >why Devuan should not be trusted, I'd say it is your problem the >inability to read and understand the technical content. If you are >really unable to understand the technical content of this "long email" >then you are definetely the wrong person to be "officially" responding. What technical content? >What else is there to say? If I no longer trust devuan for the very >specific reasons and evidence I have provided why would I have a >technical problem and if I did why would I trust you to help me with >it? What exact evidence? Please, I must be fscking stupid, explain it in simple terms. >Your response is every proof I needed that there is something fishy >going on. It may be legal to be deceiving people but the question is >whether it is ethical and whether once you discover a rat are you >responsible to make the discovery public. That is the dilemma. There >is nothing technical about it! You're free to conspire until the end of time mate, it doesn't change the fact that it's still bullsh!t.
m712();
--
https://nextchan.org -- https://gitgud.io/blazechan/blazechan
I am awake between 3AM-8PM UTC, HMU if the site's broken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
