On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 09:46:59PM +0200, Antony Stone wrote: > On Friday 30 March 2018 at 21:39:14, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:28:00AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > > > > Here's why I wouldn't use Palemoon if it were the last browser on earth: > > > > > > https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 > > > > Is there another name that palemoon could be called? > > Of course - we could call it anything we like - they even include "default > branding" in their source tree, and anyone's free to use that if they don't > want to develop their own (I've not looked at it, I have no idea how > appealing > it is). > > The main question is whether anyone wants to support / encourage / depend > upstream on a developer group with those attitudes to packagers. > > Okay, licensing and trademarks are important, but there are ways of asking > people to play nicely and there are ways of setting the dogs on them at first > opportunity...
They do prrovide another name one can use. I quote from the online discussion about the alleged misuse of "Pale Moon": As for branding, the default branding (when not using --enable-official-branding) is the New Moon branding included in the tree which has no limitations (see redist point 13 in the current version). -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
