Quoting KatolaZ (kato...@freaknet.org):

> Yeah, I knew the link, and it correctly says that net-tools has not
> seen a new release since 2011 (which is 7 years, not 17 :P).
> 
> And thanks a lot for the link. This is the way a discussion should go
> :)

Yr. very welcome!  On the arithmetic error, I plead caffeine underflow
error.  ;->

> Rick, thanks again for this other link: I will go through the thread,
> promise, and I am sure I will learn something useful. My whole point
> was that old does not necessarily mean bad (which seems to have become
> fancy these days) or gold (which is another dangerous tenet).

With which I heartily agree.  

I'll also admit that I grumbled mightily about ceasing to use nslookup,
because, essentially, just decades of familiarity.  Downright cranky 
I was about needing to learn 'dig'.  But the latter's advantages
were compelling, even before you stopped to consider nslookup's
queasy-making use of antique BIND 4.x spaghetti code.

-- 
Cheers,              "I am a member of a civilization (IAAMOAC).  Step back
Rick Moen            from anger.  Study how awful our ancestors had it, yet
r...@linuxmafia.com  they struggled to get you here.  Repay them by appreciating
McQ! (4x80)          the civilization you inherited."           -- David Brin
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to