[… personal attacks against Didier omitted …]

I recommend to go back to basic netiquette. Attacking others in person 
is not going to help anyone, nor does it add to a friendly community 
around Devuan.

Alessandro Selli - 22.11.18, 21:55:
>   You are again blockheadedly ignoring the fact that read-only is
> *NOT* the only setting that make sense changing on the /usr
> filesystem!  There are several, and I already *twice* listed a few of
> them: nobarrier, noatime, iversion, nodev, etc etc.

barrier related mount options are deprecated, well even removed at least 
for XFS, deprecated in 4.10 and and removed in 4.19¹. Write barriers 
have been replaced by explicit cache flushes² (somewhere around 2.6.39… 
I am too lazy to look it up in my Linux Performance tuning and analysis 
training slides right now). But with kernels still supporting the mount 
option, nobarrier or barrier=0 would have been simply dangerous for data 
integrity unless you have made sure that no sudden write interruption by 
for example power loss can happen. Cause it would cause journaling 
filesystems to be unable to met strict write ordering demands that are 
required for journaling to actually work reliably. By doing so, you 
could basically also run Ext4 without journal at all, in order to 
optimize performance. There are use cases for that, but if you 
appreciate your filesystem integrity even in a case of power loss… I'd 
recommend not doing so.

[1] xfs: remove deprecated barrier/nobarrier mount options
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10487561/

[2] Jonathin Corbet,The end of block barriers:
https://lwn.net/Articles/400541/

Ciao,
-- 
Martin


_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to