On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 09:07:44PM +0200, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote: > You really think that the numbers working on the linux kernel are > somehow comparable to the numbers working on Devuan?
Every person working on the linux kernel is working on Devuan. Every Debian developer is working on Devuan. As long as you avoid scope creep, an add-on can be done with only little work. At the extreme, the best Devuan would be a non-existing Devuan: when there's no need for it. With the number of bugs in systemd[1], this implies working sane inits without regressions. And alas, Debian is far from that. So Devuan, for now, is needed. And the number of regressions seems to be _increasing_ -- both in systemd itself and in Debian-without-systemd (because of integration with the former). [1]. This new machine I'm sitting at won't even boot with systemd. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Did ya know that typing "test -j8" instead of "ctest -j8" ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ will make your testsuite pass much faster, and fix bugs? ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
